The continuous infusion of acylated ghrelin enhances growth hormone secretion and worsens glucose metabolism in humans.

CONTEXT: Acylated ghrelin (AG) has been discovered as a natural ligand of the GH secretagogue receptor type 1a and is now recognized as an important orexigenic factor. Besides stimulation of GH secretion and appetite, it exerts other central and peripheral actions including modulation of insulin secretion, glucose and lipid metabolism. OBJECTIVE: To define the effects of the continuous iv infusion of AG in humans with particular attention to metabolic parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied the effects of 16- h (from 21:00 to 13:00 h) infusion of AG (0.5 microg/kg/h) or saline in 8 young volunteers who were provided with isocaloric balanced meals. GH, cortisol, insulin, glucose, free fatty acid (FFA), and ghrelin levels were assayed every 20 min. RESULTS: AG infusion increased circulating total ghrelin to a steady state that was maintained over 16 h infusion of the peptide. With respect to saline, AG infusion significantly modified GH, cortisol, insulin, and glucose profiles and decreased FFA area under the curve (p<0.01). AG increased GH pulse frequency and approximate entropy (p<0.05). AG enhanced the glucose response to both dinner (p<0.02) and breakfast (p<0.03). AG infusion blunted the early insulin response to dinner (p<0.03) but enhanced the second-phase insulin response to dinner and breakfast (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The continuous exposure to AG in humans enhances somatotroph secretion but also worsens glucose metabolism, although it inhibits lipolysis. These findings in normal young volunteers are consistent with data from studies in animals and suggest that acylated ghrelin is likely to play a negative role in glucose metabolism.

Unacylated as well as acylated ghrelin promotes cell survival and inhibit apoptosis in HIT-T15 pancreatic beta-cells.

Ghrelin is mainly produced by the stomach, although it is expressed in other tissues, including the pancreas. Among its pleiotropic actions, ghrelin prevents the development of diabetes in rats and exerts mitogenic and antiapoptotic effects in different cell types. In addition, a ghrelin-producing epsilon-cell population has been demonstrated in rodent islets, suggesting a direct role in the control of islet cell survival. In this study, we investigated the effect of acylated ghrelin (AG) and unacylated ghrelin (UAG) on cell survival of HIT-T15 pancreatic beta cells. We show that both AG and UAG equally prevented beta cell death induced by serum withdrawal. In addition, both peptides inhibited serum starvation-induced apoptosis. These findings indicate that UAG and AG prevent cell death and apoptosis of pancreatic beta cells. Since only AG, but not UAG, binds the GRLN receptor, a different and as yet unknown receptor is likely involved in these survival mechanisms.

Cortistatin-17 and -14 exert the same endocrine activities as somatostatin in humans.

Cortistatin (CST) is a neuropeptide, which binds with high affinity all somatostatin (SS) receptor subtypes and shows high structural homology with SS itself. A receptor specific for CST only, i.e., not recognized by SS, has been recently described in agreement with data reporting that not all CST actions are shared by SS. Interestingly, CST but not SS also binds ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1a) in vitro, suggesting a potential interplay between CST and ghrelin system. The aim of this study was to investigate in humans the endocrine and metabolic activities of human CST-17 in comparison with rat CST-14 that has previously been shown to exert the same endocrine actions of SS in healthy volunteers. To this aim, in six healthy male volunteers (age [median, 3rd-97th centiles]: 28.5; 23.6-34.3 years; Body Mass Index: 23.5; 21.0-25.1 kg/m(2)), we studied the effects of human CST-17 (2.0 microg/kg/h iv over 120 min), rat CST-14 (2.0 microg/kg/h iv over 120 min) and SS-14 (2.0 microg/kg/h iv over 120 min) on: (a) spontaneous GH, ACTH, PRL, cortisol, insulin and glucose levels; (b) the GH responses to GHRH (1.0 microg/kg iv at 0 min); (c) the GH, PRL, ACTH, cortisol, insulin and glucose responses to ghrelin (1.0 microg/kg iv at 0 min). CST-17 inhibited (p < 0.01) basal GH secretion to the same extent of CST-14 and SS-14. Spontaneous PRL, ACTH and cortisol secretion were not significantly modified by CST-17, CST-14 or SS-14. CST-17 as well as CST-14 and SS-14 also inhibited (p < 0.05) spontaneous insulin secretion to a similar extent. None of these peptides modified glucose levels. The GH response to GHRH was inhibited to the same extent by CST-17 (p < 0.01), CST-14 (p < 0.01) and SS-14 (p < 0.05 ). The ghrelin-induced GH response was higher than that elicited by GHRH (p < 0.01) and inhibited by CST-17 (p < 0.05) as well as by CST-14 (p < 0.05) and SS-14 (p < 0.01). The PRL, ACTH and cortisol responses to ghrelin were unaffected by CST-17, CST-14 or SS-14. On the other hand, the inhibitory effect of ghrelin on insulin levels was abolished by CST-17, CST-14 or SS-14 (p < 0.05) that, in turn, did not modify the ghrelin-induced increase in glucose levels. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that human CST-17 and rat CST-14 exert the same endocrine activities of SS in humans. The endocrine actions of human and rat CST therefore are likely to reflect activation of classical SS receptors.

The endocrine response to acute ghrelin administration is blunted in patients with anorexia nervosa, a ghrelin hypersecretory state.

OBJECTIVE: Ghrelin, a gastric-derived natural ligand of the GH secretagogue (GHS)-receptor (GHS-R), strongly stimulates GH secretion but also possesses other neuroendocrine actions, stimulates food intake and modulates the endocrine pancreas and energy homeostasis. Ghrelin secretion is negatively modulated by food intake. Similarly, glucose and also insulin probably exert an inhibitory effect on ghrelin secretion. Fasting ghrelin levels are reduced in obesity, elevated in anorexia nervosa and restored by weight recovery. The chronic elevation of circulating ghrelin levels in anorexia suggested the hypothesis of an alteration of the sensitivity to the orexigenic action of ghrelin in this condition. The aim of this study was to define the endocrine actions of ghrelin in patients with anorexia nervosa. DESIGN: We enrolled nine women with anorexia nervosa of restricter type [AN; age (mean +/- SEM) 24.2 +/- 1.8 years; body mass index (BMI) 14.7 +/- 0.4 kg/m2] and seven normal young women in their early follicular phase as control group (NW; age 30.6 +/- 3.1 years; BMI 20.3 +/- 0.5 kg/m2). MEASUREMENTS: In all the subjects we studied the GH, PRL, ACTH, cortisol, insulin and glucose responses to acute ghrelin administration (1.0 microg/kg as i.v. bolus). The GH response to GHRH (1.0 microg/kg as i.v. bolus) and basal ghrelin and IGF-I levels were also evaluated in all the subjects. RESULTS: Basal morning ghrelin and GH levels in AN (643.6 +/- 21.3 ng/l and 10.4 +/- 0.5 microg/l, respectively) were higher (P < 0.05) than in NW (233.5 +/- 14.2 ng/l and 0.7 +/- 0.7 microg/l, respectively). However, IGF-I levels in AN (145.3 +/- 10.9 microg/l) were lower (P < 0.05) than in NW (325.4 +/- 12.6 microg/l). The GH response to GHRH in AN was higher (P < 0.05) than that in NW, but in AN the GH response to ghrelin was lower (P < 0.05) than that in NW. In AN and NW ghrelin also induced similar increases (P < 0.05) in PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels. Ghrelin administration was followed by significant increase in glucose levels in NW (P < 0.05) but not in AN. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that anorexia nervosa, a clinical condition of ghrelin hypersecretion, shows a specific reduction in the GH response to ghrelin, despite the hyper-responsiveness to GHRH administration. The impaired GH response to ghrelin in anorexia nervosa agrees with previous evidence of blunted GH response to synthetic GH secretagogues and could reflect desensitization of the GHS receptor induced by the chronic elevation of ghrelin levels in this pathological state.

H9c2 cardiac muscle cells express all somatostatin receptor subtypes.

The aim of the present study was to verify the hypothesis that SS receptor subtypes (SSTRs) are expressed by H9c2 cardiac muscle cells. SSTRs expression was investigated by RT-PCR and Western blot analysis at both mRNA and protein level. Our findings demonstrate that H9c2 cells express all SSTR subtypes I-5 (SSTRI-5) at the mRNA and protein level. Thus, H9c2 cells would represent a new model to study the direct biological activities of SS and its analogues at the cardiac level.

Ghrelin: a link between eating disorders, obesity and reproduction.

Ghrelin, a 28-amino acid acylated peptide predominantly produced by the stomach, displays strong GH-releasing activity mediated by the hypothalamic-pituitary GH secretagogues (GHS) receptors (GHS-R) which had been shown specific for a family of synthetic, orally active molecules known as GHS. However, ghrelin and GHS, acting on central and peripheral receptors, also exert other actions. These include influence on pituitary functions, orexigenic action, influence on exocrine and endocrine gastro-entero-pancreatic functions, cardiovascular and anti-proliferative effects. In particular, the effect of ghrelin in promoting food intake and modulating energy metabolism strongly suggested that ghrelin has a key role in managing the neuroendocrine and metabolic response to starvation and that could be involved in the pathogenesis and/or in the metabolic and neuro-hormonal alterations of obesity and eating disorders. Although specific alterations in ghrelin secretion and/or action in obesity and anorexia nervosa (AN) have already been reported, the possibility that ghrelin analogues acting as agonists or antagonists has clinical perspectives for treatment of eating disorders presently remains a dream.

Effects of cortistatin-14 and somatostatin-14 on the endocrine response to hexarelin in humans.

Cortistatin (CST)-14, a neuropeptide with high structural homology with somatostatine (SS)-14, binds all SS receptor subtypes but also shows activities not shared by SS. CST and SS are often co-expressed in the same neurons but are regulated by different stimuli. Moreover, CST, but not SS, also binds the GH secretagogue (GHS) receptor. We compared the effects of CST-14 and SS-14 (2.0 microg/kg/h i.v. from -30 to +90 min) on the endocrine response to hexarelin (HEX, 1.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min), a synthetic GHS, in 6 normal volunteers [age (mean+/-SEM): 28.7+/-2.9 yr; body mass index: 23.4+/-0.8 kg/m2]. GH, PRL, ACTH, cortisol, insulin and glucose levels were measured at each time point. CST-14 inhibited spontaneous GH secretion [delta-areas under curves (-AUC): -83.57+/-44.8 vs 2.3+/-2.7 microg/l/h, p<0.01] to the same extent of SS-14 (-186.1+/-162.9 microg/l/h, p<0.01). CST-14 as well as SS-14 also inhibited insulin secretion (p<0.05). The GH response to HEX was similarly inhibited by either CST-14 (AUC: 3814.1+/-924.2 vs 1212.9+/-379.8 microg/l/h, p<0.05) or SS-14 (720.9+/-158.6 microg/l/h, p<0.05). HEX significantly increased PRL, ACTH and cortisol levels but these responses were not modified by either CST-14 or SS-14. The effects of CST-14 and SS-14 on insulin and glucose levels were not modified by HEX. In conclusion, this study shows that CST-14 inhibits the GH response to HEX to the same extent of SS-14. Like SS-14, CST-14 also inhibits insulin secretion but both do not modify the stimulatory effects of HEX on lactotroph and corticotroph secretion. Thus, CST-14 exerts full SS-14 activity in humans.

Neuroendocrine and metabolic effects of acute ghrelin administration in human obesity.

Ghrelin stimulates appetite and plays a role in the neuroendocrine response to energy balance variations. Ghrelin levels are inversely associated with body mass index (BMI), increased by fasting and decreased by food intake, glucose load, insulin, and somatostatin. Ghrelin levels are reduced in obesity, a condition of hyperinsulinism, reduced GH secretion, and hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis hyperactivity. We studied the endocrine and metabolic response to acute ghrelin administration (1.0 microg/kg i.v.) in nine obese women [OB; BMI (mean +/- SD) 36.3 +/- 2.3 kg/m(2)] and seven normal women (NW; BMI 20.3 +/- 1.7 kg/m(2)). Basal ghrelin levels in NW were higher than in OB (P < 0.05). In NW, ghrelin increased (P < 0.05) GH, prolactin (PRL), ACTH, cortisol, and glucose levels but did not modify insulin. In OB, ghrelin increased (P < 0.01) GH, PRL, ACTH, and cortisol levels. The GH response to ghrelin in OB was 55% lower (P < 0.02) than in NW, whereas the PRL, ACTH, and cortisol responses were similar. In OB, ghrelin increased glucose and reduced insulin (P < 0.05). Thus, obesity shows remarkable reduction of the somatotroph responsiveness to ghrelin, suggesting that ghrelin hyposecretion unlikely explains the impairment of somatotroph function in obesity. On the other hand, in obesity ghrelin shows preserved influence on PRL, ACTH, and insulin secretion as well as in glucose levels.

Prolonged treatment with glycerophosphocholine, an acetylcholine precursor, does not disclose the potentiating effect of cholinesterase inhibitors on GHRH-induced somatotroph secretion in anorexia nervosa.

Unlike normal subjects, in patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) the GH response to GHRH is refractory to the increasing and inhibitory effect of cholinergic agonists and antagonists, respectively. This cholinergic impairment could reflect malnutrition-induced exhaustion of acetylcholine (Ach) precursors. We studied whether treatment with glycerophosphocholine (GLY), an Ach precursor, could disclose the potentiating effect of pyridostigmine (PD) on the GH response to GHRH in AN. In 6 young women with AN (AW) we studied the GH response to iv GHRH (1.0 microg/kg) alone and combined with oral PD (120 mg) before and after 1 month of oral treatment with GLY (400 mg thrice daily). Eight age-matched normal women (NW) were studied as controls. Before GLY, basal GH levels in AW were higher (p < 0.05) than in NW. The GH response to GHRH in AW was higher (p < 0.05) than in NW. PD failed to modify the GHRH-induced GH rise in AW, while it enhanced it in NW (p < 0.05). One month treatment with GLY in AW did not modify the GH response to GHRH either alone or combined with PD. This study shows the existence of a derangement in the cholinergic control of somatotroph function in AN and indicates that treatment with Ach precursors does not exert any effect on this impairment. This could reflect primary alterations of cholinergic neurons, though the effectiveness of more prolonged treatment and/or higher doses of cholinergic precursors needs to be verified.

Effects of ghrelin on the insulin and glycemic responses to glucose, arginine, or free fatty acids load in humans.

Ghrelin possesses central and peripheral endocrine actions including influence on the endocrine pancreatic function. To clarify this latter ghrelin action, in seven normal young subjects [age (mean +/- SEM), 28.3 +/- 3.1 yr; body mass index, 21.9 +/- 0.9 kg/m(2)), we studied insulin and glucose levels after acute ghrelin administration (1.0 microg/kg i.v.) alone or combined with glucose [oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), 100 g orally], arginine (ARG, 0.5 g/kg i.v.) or free fatty acid (FFA, Intralipid 10%, 250 ml). Ghrelin inhibited (P < 0.05) insulin and increased (P < 0.05) glucose levels. OGTT increased (P < 0.01) glucose and insulin levels. FFA increased (P < 0.05) glucose but did not modify insulin levels. ARG increased (P < 0.05) both insulin and glucose levels. Ghrelin did not modify both glucose and insulin responses to OGTT as well as the FFA-induced increase in glucose levels; however, ghrelin administration was followed by transient insulin decrease also during FFA. Ghrelin blunted (P < 0.05) the insulin response to ARG and enhanced (P < 0.05) the ARG-induced increase in glucose levels. In all, ghrelin induces transient decrease of spontaneous insulin secretion and selectively blunts the insulin response to ARG but not to oral glucose load. On the other hand, ghrelin raises basal glucose levels and enhances the hyperglycemic effect of ARG but not that of OGTT. These findings support the hypothesis that ghrelin exerts modulatory action of insulin secretion and glucose metabolism in humans.

Suppression and recovery of LH secretion by a potent and selective GnRH-receptor antagonist peptide in healthy early follicular-phase women are mediated via selective control of LH secretory burst mass.

AIM: GnRH antagonists are competitive inhibitors of GnRH receptors. Their administration induces prompt suppression of the gonadal axis. In animals, GnRH antagonists upregulate the activity of GnRH-secreting neurones, which could cause gonadotrophin rebound following inhibition. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a potent GnRH antagonist, Teverelix (TEV), on the gonadal axis in healthy young women. SUBJECTS AND MEASUREMENTS: In nine women [20-35 years old, body mass index (BMI) 19-25 kg/m2] in the early follicular phase, serum LH and FSH levels were evaluated every 10 min from 08.00 to 12.00 h before, and 24 h and 96 h after TEV injection (2.5 mg in 1 ml subcutaneously on day 0). Serum gonadotrophin and oestradiol levels were also evaluated at baseline and at 6, 8, 12, 48, 72 h after TEV. RESULTS: The antagonist reduced both serum LH and FSH concentrations; LH levels were significantly and promptly reduced at +6 h (nadir at +8 h) until +48 h and recovered at +72 h, while FSH levels were reduced (P<0.05) 24 h after the antagonist and normalized at +48 h. LH (but not FSH) concentrations at +96 h exceeded baseline (P<0.05). TEV suppressed oestradiol concentrations (P<0.05) with a nadir at +24 h, comparable reduction at +48 h and recovery to baseline at +72 h. Deconvolution analysis showed that the antagonist peptide suppressed (P<0.02) the pulsatile production rate, burst mass and amplitude of LH on day 1. Pulsatile FSH secretion also fell at this time (P<0.05). LH and FSH pulse frequency were not modified by TEV. At +96 h, LH pulsatility did not significantly differ from that at baseline. Suppression of mean LH or FSH concentrations did not affect the relative pattern regularity (approximate entropy) of LH and FSH secretion. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the acute administration of a potent GnRH antagonist induces prompt inhibition of the gonadal axis lasting for 2 days in women due to mechanistically specific suppression of LH secretory burst mass and the mean FSH secretion rate. The trend toward rebound release of LH following the end of the pharmacological effect of the antagonist could reflect a rise in endogenous GnRH activity.

[Endocrine abnormalities in anorexia nervosa]. / Alterazioni endocrine nell'anoressia nervosa.

Anorexia nervosa is a syndrome with multifactorial etiology in which several genetic, biologic, psychological and social factors are involved. Patients affected by anorexia nervosa (AN) may develop multiple endocrine abnormalities, e.g. amenorrhea, hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis hyperactivity, low T3 syndrome and peculiar changes of somatotroph axis function. These endocrine abnormalities are also found after prolonged starvation and may represent an adaptive response developed in order to save energy and proteins. It is still a matter of debate whether these endocrine changes are etiologic or secondary. In fact, several evidences suggest the existence in AN of hypothalamus functional alterations, which may be involved in the development and maintenance of the food intake disorder; on the other hand, the increased CRH secretion seems to be secondary to malnutrition as well as GH hypersecretion coupled to low IGF-I levels; the latter is a common finding in AN, as well as in other undernutrition and malabsorption conditions, type 1 diabetes mellitus, liver cirrhosis and catabolic states. Hypothalamic amenorrhea, which is one of the diagnostic criteria for AN, is not linked only to the reduction of body weight but reflects also deep alterations of gonadotropin secretory pattern. Low T3 syndrome is frequently found in AN; on the other hand, an iodide-induced hypothyroidism is quite uncommon. T3 reduction in AN seems to be an adaptive response to prolonged starvation; however the presence of a simultaneous central dysregulation cannot be excluded. Finally, AN patients frequently show defects in urinary concentration or dilution with inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone, which may be due to intrinsic defects in the neurohypophysis or to abnormalities of its regulatory afferent neurons.

Natural and synthetic growth hormone secretagogues: do they have therapeutic potential?

Ghrelin, a 28 amino acid-acylated peptide predominantly produced by the stomach, displays strong growth hormone (GH)-releasing activity. It is mediated by the hypothalamic-pituitary GH secretagogue (GHS) receptors, which are specific to a family of synthetic, orally active molecules known as GHSs. However, despite their potent and reproducible GH-releasing activity, the potential clinical use of GHSs as orally active growth-promoting agents or anabolic anti-aging drugs has not been confirmed. Ghrelin and GHSs also exert other actions mediated through central and peripheral receptors, including stimulation of adrenocorticotrophic hormone and prolactin secretion, influence on insulin secretion and glucose metabolism, orexigenic effects and modulatory activity on the neuroendocrine and metabolic response to starvation, influence on exocrine gastro-entero-pancreatic functions, cardiovascular effects and modulation of cell proliferation and apoptosis. The discovery of ghrelin and the characterization of these GH-independent biological activities has widened the knowledge of some critical aspects of neuroendocrinology and suggests possible roles for GHSs and ghrelin in the treatment of pathophysiological conditions, including those unrelated to disorders of GH secretion.

Standard light breakfast inhibits circulating ghrelin level to the same extent of oral glucose load in humans, despite different impact on glucose and insulin levels.

Ghrelin levels are increased by fasting and energy restriction, decreased by food intake, glucose load and insulin but not by lipids and amino acids. Accordingly, ghrelin levels are elevated in anorexia and cachexia and reduced in obesity. Herein we compared the effects of a standardized light breakfast (SLB) on morning circulating ghrelin levels with those of oral glucose load (OGTT) in normal subjects. Specifically, 8 young adult volunteers [age (mean+/-SEM): 28.0+/-2.0 yr; body mass index (BMI): 22.4+/-0.6 kg/m2] underwent the following testing sessions: a) OGTT (100 g p.o. at 0 min, about 400 kcal); b) SLB (about 400 kcal, 45% carbohydrates, 13% proteins and 42% lipids at 0 min) on three different days; c) placebo (100 ml water p.o.). In all sessions, at baseline, blood samples were withdrawn twice at 5-min interval to characterize the inter- and intra-individual reproducibility of the variables assayed. After placebo and OGTT, blood samples were withdrawn every 15 min up to +120 min. After SLB, blood samples were taken at 60 min only. Ghrelin, insulin and glucose levels were assayed at each time point in all sessions. Similarly to insulin and glucose levels, at baseline, ghrelin showed remarkable intra-subject reproducibility both in the same sessions and among the different sessions. Placebo did not significantly modify ghrelin, insulin and glucose. OGTT increased (p<0.01) glucose (baseline vs peak: 80.0+/-3.6 vs 140.5+/-6.3 mg/dl) and insulin (20.2+/-6.2 vs 115.3+/-10.3 mU/l) levels. SLB increased (p<0.05) both insulin (16.3+/-1.8 vs 48.3+/-6.3 mU/l) and glucose (74.5+/-3.7 vs 82.9+/-3.1 mg/dl) levels. Notably both the insulin and glucose increases after OGTT were significantly higher (p<0.01) than that induced by SLB. After OGTT, ghrelin levels underwent a significant reduction (baseline vs nadir: 355.7+/-150.8 vs 243.3+/-98.8 pg/ml; p<0.05) reaching the nadir at time +60 min. Similarly, ghrelin levels 60 min after SLB (264.8+/-44.8 pg/ml) were significantly (p<0.01) lower than at baseline (341.4+/-54.9 pg/ml). No significant differences in the reduction of ghrelin levels after OGTT and SLB were observed. In conclusion, these findings show that light breakfast inhibits ghrelin secretion to the same extent of OGTT in adults despite lower variations in glucose and insulin levels.

Concomitant impairment of growth hormone secretion and peripheral sensitivity in obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

To clarify the impairment of the GH/IGF-I axis in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), in 13 adult male patients with OSAS (OSA) as well as 15 weight-matched patients with simple obesity (OB) and 10 normal lean male subjects (NS), we studied: 1) the GH response to GHRH (1 micro g/kg iv) plus arginine (30 g iv); and 2) the IGF-I and IGF binding protein-3 responses to a very low dose recombinant human (rh)GH treatment (5.0 microg/kg sc per day for 4 d). The GH response to arginine plus GHRH in OSA was lower than in OB (P < 0.05), which in turn was lower than in NS (P < 0.001). Basal IGF-I levels in OSA were lower than in OB (P < 0.05), which in turn were lower than in NS (P < 0.03). As opposed to OB and NS, in OSA a very low rhGH dose did not affect IGF-I. Adjusting for age and basal values, rhGH-induced IGF-I rise in OSA was lower than in OB (P < 0.01). IGF binding protein-3, glucose, and insulin levels in the three groups were not modified by rhGH. OSA show a more marked impairment of the maximal secretory capacity of somatotroph cells together with reduced IGF-I sensitivity to rhGH stimulation. These findings suggest that OSAS is connoted by a concomitant impairment of GH secretion and sensitivity.

Alprazolam, a benzodiazepine, does not modify the ACTH and cortisol response to hCRH and AVP, but blunts the cortisol response to ACTH in humans.

Alprazolam (AL), a benzodiazepine which activates gamma-amino butyrric acid (GABA)-ergic receptors, exerts a clear inhibitory effect on the activity of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and is able to markedly reduce the ACTH response to metyrapone-induced inhibition of glucocorticoid feedback. It has been suggested that its inhibitory action could be regulated by CRH or AVP mediated mechanisms. However, the effect of benzodiazepines on the HPA response to CRH or AVP is contradictory. It has been shown that benzodiazepines have specific receptors on the adrenal gland but it is unclear if they mediate biological effects in humans. In order to further clarify the mechanisms underlying the inhibitory effect of benzodiazepine on HPA axis in humans, we studied the effect of AL (0.02 mg/kg po at -90 min) or placebo in 7 healthy young volunteers (7 female, age: 26-34 yr; wt: 50-58 kg, BMI 20-22 kg/m2) on: 1) the ACTH and cortisol responses to hCRH (2.0 microg/kg iv at 0 min) or AVP (0.17 U/kg im at 0 min); 2) the cortisol, aldosterone and DHEA responses to ACTH 1-24 (0.06 and 250 microg iv at 0 and 60 min, respectively). After placebo, the ACTH and cortisol responses to hCRH (peaks, mean+/-SE: 29.8+/-4.4 pg/ml and 199.3+/-19.6 microg/l) were similar to those recorded after AVP (31.7+/-6.5 pg/ml and 164.8+/-18.0 microg/l); the cortisol response to 0.06 microg ACTH (190.4+/-11.8 microg/l) was similar to that recorded after hCRH and AVP but lower (p<0.01) than that after 250 microg ACTH (260.6+/-17.4 microg/l). AL did not modify the ACTH response to both hCRH (42.5+/-7.1 pg/ml) and AVP (33.3+/-2.7 pg/ml), which even showed a trend toward increase. AL also failed to significantly modify the cortisol response to both hCRH (156.3+/-12.7 microg/l) and AVP (119.4+/-14.5 microg/l), which, on the other hand, showed a trend toward decrease. The cortisol peaks after 0.06 microg ACTH were significantly reduced (p<0.02) by AL pre-treatment (115.0+/-7.7 microg/l) which, in turn, did not modify the cortisol response to the subsequent ACTH bolus (214.7+/-16.6 microg/l). The DHEA and aldosterone responses to all the ACTH doses were not significantly modified by AL. In conclusion, these data show that the HPA response to AVP as well as to hCRH is refractory to the inhibitory effect of AL which, in turn, blunts the cortisol response to low ACTH dose. These findings suggest that both CRH- and AVP-mediated mechanisms could underlie the CNS-mediated inhibitory effect of AL on HPA axis; in the meantime, these results suggest that benzodiazepines could also act on adrenal gland by blunting the sensitivity of the fasciculata zone to ACTH.

Activity of GH/IGF-1 axis in burn patients: comparison with normal subjects and patients with GH deficiency.

The aim of this study was to clarify the activity of GH/IGF-1 axis as well as the variations of nutritional parameters following a thermal injury in man. To this goal, in 22 patients with burn [BURN, age (mean+/-SE): 46.5+/-3.4 yr, BMI: 25.0+/-0.8 kg/m2, % burn surface area: 26.0+/-3.0%, ROI score: 0.22+/-0.1] we evaluated IGF-1, IGF binding protein (IGFBP-3), GH, GH binding protein (GHBP), pre-albumin (pre-A), albumin (A) and transferrin (TRA) levels on days 1, 3, 7, 14 and 28 after intensive care unit (ICU) admission. IGF-1, IGFBP-3, GH and GHBP levels were also assayed basally in 29 normal subjects (Ns) (Ns, age: 47.5+/-2.8 yr, BMI: 22.0+/-1.4 kg/m2) and in 34 panhypopituitary patients with severe GH deficiency (GHD, age: 42.7+/-2.5 yr, BMI: 25.6+/-0.8 kg/m2). On ICU day 1, IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 in BURN were higher than those in GHD (p<0.05 for both, respectively) and lower than those in Ns (p<0.05) while GH levels in BURN did not differ from those in Ns and higher than GHD (p<0.01). In BURN, IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels showed a progressive decline (p<0.05) with nadir on day 14, when they overlapped those in GHD, and then an increase on day 28, though persisting lower than in Ns, while GH levels did not vary during ICU stay. IGF-I levels were associated neither to burn extension nor to ROI score. On ICU day 1 pre-A, A and TRA levels were similar to those in Ns, but underwent a progressive decrease with nadir on day 7 (p<0.001) for pre-A and TRA, and later, on day 14 (p<0.05) for A; pre-A and TRA but not A showed a rebound increase (p<0.01) on day 14, though persistingly lower than in Ns. In conclusion, our present data firstly show the time course variation of IGF-I levels in burn patients as function of nutritional and hormonal variables. It has to be emphasized that in the most critical phase after burn injuries, IGF-1 levels are as low as in hypopituitary patients with severe GHD. The physiological basis which leads to the impairment of this endogenous anabolic drive in this phase is, however, not clear yet.

Activity of GH/IGF-I axis in trauma and septic patients during artificial nutrition: different behavior patterns?

The aim of this study was to compare several parameters of GH/IGF-I axis activity in septic and trauma patients during Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay. To this goal, 13 patients with sepsis (SEP) and 16 with trauma (TRA) were studied. Thirty-three adult subjects (AS) were studied as controls. Serum IGF-I and -II, IGFBP-1, -2 and -3, GH and GHBP levels were studied on day 1, 3, 5 and 7 after ICU admission, during comparable artificial nutrition in SEP and TRA and basally in AS. In 5 patients with SEP and 6 with TRA, the GH response to GHRH was evaluated on day 3. On ICU day 1, IGF-I and -II and IGFBP-3 in SEP were lower (p<0.05) than in TRA which, in turn, were lower (p<0.01) than in AS. IGF-I increased (p<0.05) both in SEP and TRA, but, on ICU day 7, those in SEP persisted lower than in TRA, which became similar to those in AS. IGF-II levels increased (p<0.05) in SEP only, persisting lower (p<0.05) than in TRA. On ICU day 1, GH in SEP and TRA were similar and did not vary until day 7, overlapping those in AS. The GH response to GHRH in SEP and TRA was similar and lower (p<0.01) than in AS. These findings indicate that IGF-I activity is impaired more in septic than in trauma patients. Reduced IGF-I activity probably reflects peripheral GH resistance though basal and GHRH-induced GH levels were not increased in these conditions.

GH/IGF-I axis in anorexia nervosa.

Patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) may develop multiple endocrine abnormalities, including amenorrhea, hyperactivity of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis, hypothyroidism and particular changes in the activity of the growth hormone (GH)/insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) axis. Exaggerated GH secretion and reduced IGF-I levels are usually found in AN, as well as in conditions of malnutrition and malabsorption, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, liver cirrhosis and catabolic states. In AN, GH hypersecretion at least partially reflects malnutrition-induced peripheral GH resistance, which leads to reduced IGF-I synthesis and release; this implies an impairment of the negative IGF-I feedback action on GH secretion. On the other hand, primary alterations in the neural control of GH secretion cannot be ruled out. The neuroendocrine alterations include enhanced somatotroph responsiveness to growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) and impaired GH response to most central nervous system-mediated stimuli. Particular resistance to cholinergic manipulation has also been demonstrated, thus suggesting a somewhat specific alteration in the somatostatin (SS)-mediated cholinergic influence on GH secretion. Moreover, paradoxical GH responses to glucose load, thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH) and luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) have also been reported. The effect of reduced leptin levels on GH hypersecretion in AN is still unclear, but ghrelin (the gastric hormone that is a natural ligand of the GH secretagogue receptor and strongly stimulates somatotroph secretion) is thought to play a major role. Regardless of the supposed central and peripheral alterations, it has to be emphasised that the activity of the GH/IGF-I axis in AN is generally restored by nutritional and stable weight gain. It therefore reflects an impaired nutritional state and cannot be considered a primary hallmark of the disease.